Nursing Research
Home of Nursing ResearchNursing Research AnnouncementsPress ReleasesArticles in Nursing ResearchAuthorsNursing Research Journal ReviewersNursing Research Journal Editorial BoardContact the Editor of Nursing Research

Home > Authors > Open Manuscript Review

These manuscripts are part of the Eastern Nursing Research Society supplement.

Click the links below to see the materials for the manuscript. These will open in Adobe Acrobat Reader as pdf files. Reader is available as a free download from http://www.adobe.com.

Manuscript 1
Sakala, C., & Mayberry, L. J. (2006). Vaginal or cesarean birth? Application of an advocacy organization-driven research translational model. Nursing Research, 55, S68-S74.
We selected this manuscript for open review because the reviewers offered specific recommendations for change, which the authors were able to use effectively. Originally the headings in the mansucript and the figure did not seem to support one another, but with revision the relationship was clarified.
The Manuscript | Review 1 | Review 2 | Review 3 | Revision Requested | Editorial Notes | Checklist for Style | Revision Letter | Acceptance Letter

Manuscript 2
Panik, A., Bokovoy, J., Karoly, E., Badillo, K., Buckenmyer, C., Vose, C., et al. (2006). Research on the frontlines of healthcare: A cooperative learning approach. Nursing Research, 55, S3-S9.
This manuscript was selected for open review because it is an example of an investigation conducted within a hospital setting using a team approach. Originally the aim of the presentation was not focused well enough. The recommendations of the reviewers were used in the revisions and the published article reflects shaping that was guided by review process.
The Manuscript | Review 1 | Review 2 | Review 3 | Revise Letter | Checklist for Style | Revision Letter | Email Correspondence | Final Revision Letter | Acceptance Letter

Manuscript 3
Erlen, J. A., & Sereika, S. M. (2006). From research to practice: Improving medication adherence in persons with HIV. Nursing Research, 55, S17-S22.
This manuscript was selected for open review because the reviews provided the authors with disparate recommendations. The authors successfully used the recommendations to strengthen and tighten their presentation.

The Manuscript | Review 1 | Review 2 | Review 3 | Revise Letter | Checklist for Style | Revision Letter | Acceptance Letter

Comment on the Open Manuscript Review

Your comments will be sent to the Editor. By submitting comments, you agree that your comments may be posted under this section on this page.

Your Name


Email Address


University Affiliation


Comments

 


Please click here to contact the webmaster regarding any technical questions about this website.